Friday, October 18, 2019

Utopian Necessity



 “A map of the world that does not include Utopia is not worth even glancing at, for it leaves out the one country at which Humanity is always landing. And when Humanity lands there, it looks out, and seeing a better country, sets sail. Progress is the realization of utopias.”
~Oscar Wilde

At this time, when we are going backwards, and the wolves at the door have formed packs and coalitions behind common banner. When when the wolf pack would seem to be in ascendancy, we need to think about utopia more than ever.

As we dare to imagine the future, we do so with a peculiar habit:
we cautiously ask ourselves what the future will be like on the basis of current trends;
we seldom ask the one big philosophically-minded question...
What should the future be like?

We proceed,  viewing the future as something to be deduced,
rather than bolder and more direct thinking.
We must learn to view the future as something to be imagined – and thereby at least in part, summoned into being.

To think in a Utopian way is a prime political act. It involves a refusal to be limited by our current obsession with the boundaries of here and now in order to focus on the world as it could and should be in order to maximize the flourishing and minimize the suffering of  humanity.

George Orwell was a Utopian thinker, he never meant for his writing to be a "road map", but rather a warning. The trouble with our current world is actually quite simple. We are bombarded every moment of every day with messages that proclaim the future will not be good and we must just learn to live with that. There is nothing we can do, so just accept defeat.
This is not so.
There are solutions to every problem.
No jigsaw puzzle is "impossible" to assemble.
The future is bleak only if we accept a bleak future.

What we need is to imagine the world as we would have it.
Imagine the world as a just place, a free place.
A world where the technology we have already developed to terraform Mars is applied in reverse (instead of creating greenhouse gases, we remove them) to bring our greenhouse gas levels back down to what they were before the industrial revolution.
(For instance).

The bottom line is that we all have a utopian side to our brains,
which we are normally careful to disguise, for fear of humiliation.
Yet, our visions are what carve out the space in which later patient and real development can occur!


We must all be committed to Utopian Thinking and the envisaging of the world as it should be.

Sunday, September 15, 2019

The Nature Of Things...Free Will and Time

A young couple fill out a pre-marriage questionnaire form.
When they came to the question, "Are you entering this marriage of your own free will?" there was a long pause.
The girl looked over at the apprehensive young man and said, "Put down yes."


Man was destined to have free will. 😙

When someone tells you things happen for a reason,

punch them in the face and say "this was meant to be."


Back in ancient Greece people didn't see their thoughts as belonging to themselves.
When ancient Greeks had a thought, they believed it was a god or goddess giving an order.
Apollo was telling them to be brave. Athena was telling them to fall in love.


Now people hear a commercial for fish flavored sour cream potato chips and rush out to buy.
The gods have changed a bit.


Due to evidence in neurosciences, scientists generally tell philosophers free will is incompatible with reality
...that it's likely incoherent against any background whatsoever.
We think we make choices, but the observations indicate our decision making "thinking" happens
AFTER the brain actually has made the choice.
We basically assemble arguments to back the decision we are unaware has already been made.


It may be time to abandon the term 'free will' to the libertarians and other incompatibilists,
who can pursue their fantasies untroubled by reality & evidences.


I submit that free will or not...the human mind is a vacuum in a sense, you see, it seeks to be filled.
The closest thing we might have to free will is choosing who fills it with ideas;
either we do it ourselves or someone else will.


Albert Einstein may have made one of the greatest observations about this, he said
"Honestly, I cannot understand what people mean when they talk about the freedom of the human will.
I have a feeling, for instance, that I will something or other;
but what relation this has with freedom I cannot understand at all.
I feel that I will to light my pipe and I do it; but how can I connect this up with the idea of freedom?
What is behind the act of willing to light the pipe? Another act of willing?"

Schopenhauer seems to have shared that view -
"Man can do what he will but he cannot will what he wills.”


The human intellect torments itself with the traditional problems of philosophy, religion, ethics, etc.
but in the big picture this diversion is meaningless.

We may believe that we are free to take either the right- or the left-hand fork in the road.

Yet can we set up a single objective criterion to prove that after the turn was made that we might have made the other?


Objectively speaking, this only relates to some personal subjective feelings while making the decision.
Not the decision itself.

Ultimately we must believe in free will, we have no choice!

😜ðŸĪŠðŸĪ”


TIME


People tell me

"Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result."

Oddly, people say that to me over and over.


Reality; whatever that may actually be, eludes us.

We wake up every morning

altogether hypnotized by an illusion we create of time,

in which the present moment is an infinitesimal hairline between an omnipotent causative past and some transcendent, absorbing. salient future.

We have no present.

Consciousness is confounded with confabulation and some imagined idea of the impending.


We do not conceptualize that there never was, is,

nor will be...any other experience than present experience.


Newton did for time what the Greek geometers did for space,

He idealized it into an exactly measurable dimension.

I submit that we are out of touch with reality.

We confuse the Universe as discussed, described, or measured in some sense with the universe that actually is.

Names, numbers, symbols, signs, conceptions and ideas are useful tools.

Yet the hammer is not the universe, even a collection of all hammers is not the universe.


It is not Hammer time. 😎


Nor is it Greenwich mean time,

nor breakfast time.

Is it closing time?...Can someone do hard time?

Give someone a hard time?

You may take your time.

You can keep good time.

You can kill time.

You can serve time.

Do you HAVE the time?

Don't waste your time!

Up time...down time..overtime.

You can make time, you can mark time.

Good times, bad times...we'll have a hell of a time!

Hot time, small time, tea time... the BIG time.

Sweet time, double time, it's clobberin' time.

Time can be Newtonian, Archimedean or non deterministic & polynomial.

There's nautical time, Planck time, old time, ragtime.

Standard time, special time, ordinary time, prime time.

Time outs, Time Bombs, & Time Shares.

You can BE on time.

Time, and time again

Yes...my friends.

It's about time.

It may be just a time anomaly...

but we're out of time

...for a time.




P.S.

I don't know if you've heard...

but eating clocks is time consuming.

ðŸĪŠ

Monday, July 15, 2019

Beyond The Metamorphosis



Humanity has been transformed in profound ways through it's history.
I am reluctant to use the phrase "tipping point" because it's been so overused, however what we are discussing here are the critical points in a situation, process, or system beyond which a significant and often unstoppable effect or change takes place. (Which is the definition of a tipping point).
In physics, this type of transformation can be visualized as rolling a round stone up a steep hill, at a certain point that stone will reach the summit; and if we continue to push it we will reach another point where it will roll down the hill. And there's not much we can do to stop it.


The engine that drives human development is knowledge...and it has been throughout history.
In the hunter-gatherer days, knowledge of fire transformed the human experience.
In those days,  humans obtained food by foraging.
Although the source of food did not change, fire allowed humans to cook food and consume more calories. The human brain expanded with this caloric increase,
Language comes along and knowledge expands.
Agriculture was invented on the strength of this growth – and humanity experienced its first true transformation: a fundamental change in the nature of being human.

We shifted from a hunter-gatherer to an agricultural society.
This was a significant change.
Hunter-gatherers were nomads in constant search of food;
with the shift to agriculture, humans settled and cities were born.
Soon, humanity had the means to create wealth,
and with wealth came oppression by withholding food, to own land, to create a ruling class, and to divide labor.

For the first time in human history, inequality was introduced to human society.
The lack of property had made ancient hunter-gatherers far more egalitarian than any subsequent society. As property multiplied, inequality grew.
With ownership of land, animals, plants, and tools,
rigid hierarchical societies emerged, and small elites monopolized most wealth and power for generations. Along the way, money, the wheel, and writing were invented.

With the invention of writing, our knowledge expanded once again.
This new-found ability to capture and share knowledge ushered in another period of innovation; including what some have called the most influential invention in human history: the printing press in the 15th century.

By ushering in the age of mass communication and enabling a scientific revolution, the structure of society was permanently altered. The age of Enlightenment followed: an intellectual and philosophical movement that dominated the world of ideas in Europe during the 18th century and threatened the power of political and religious authorities.


When the steam engine was invented in the 18th century, knowledge scaled rapidly.
Beyond the impact on transport and production, perhaps the bigger impact was on the massive knowledge-fueled innovation that followed.
An MIT study found the steam engine to be the most Impactful Innovation in human history.
When it combined with the printing press, the world experienced its most prolific period of knowledge development and sharing.
A steam-powered printing press revolutionized the print industry and improved the literacy rate throughout the western hemisphere.
As a result, the world went through a second metamorphosis - the Industrial Age.

The inventions of this period established the modern era
and set the current standard of living in the western world.
Electricity, running water, sanitation, antibiotics, refrigeration,
advances in the social contract, and many more innovations
were at the heart of this special time in history.
In the late stages of the industrial revolution, the Internet connected society.
Up to this point, the world had not experienced the ability to seamlessly share knowledge, ideas, capabilities and more. Globalization emerged from a reduction in the cost of transport, Globalization 2.0 resulted from a reduction in the cost of sharing knowledge.
This is where the seeds of the next transformation were sown.

Artificial intelligence takes the knowledge explosion to its logical pinnacle.
The combination of machines and biotechnology will alter yet again what it means to be human.
The world is on the precipice of becoming  an automated and transhuman society.
 This emerging radical change is driven by the overwhelming automation of labor, the requisite reinvention of traditional wage-earning employment, and the convergence of humans with their machines.
Automation-enabling infusions of capital over the next 10 to 20 years will displace much of conventional labor. Once the first companies automate, history indicates the others are likely to follow to stay competitive.

This coming transformation is nearly inevitable.
(barring some possibility that we may experience some sort of Sisyphus Effect)

 The question is, have we the wisdom to guide the transformation in a useful way?
Will we simply allow the same old greed driven hierarchies,
created in the last 2 transformations, to flourish and expand exponentially?
Or will we exercise some degree of control over the fate of mankind, to the extent we can?
The underlying promise of civilization is a means of providing prosperity,
not just for a few...but the many.
Even in the interest of their own greed, those who've set themselves at the top of the human social hierarchy must be made to understand that their ability to continue
acquiring wealth rests ultimately on some type of consumption.
If vast swaths of humanity have no viable income, no way to buy the goods or services being sold; it all economically grinds to a halt.
A completely new economic paradigm is required.
It's not an option.

At the far end of this spectrum is the potential for conscious machines and radical human life extension. Biologists continue to unlock the mysteries of the brain. At the same time technology gives us unprecedented capability. When these two phenomenon merge, the possibility exists for machines to monitor and understand human brains better than we can ourselves. Authority could then shift from humans to machines, and biological inequality might just stand alongside economic inequality.

The coming metamorphosis in biotechnology and AI information technology require fresh visions.
We must be architects this advancement, and  ethics must increasingly dominate our discourse over the next two decades.
We need an accelerated learning and dialog.
We shoulder the responsibility of  taking part in creating our emerging future.
It is incumbent upon us.


Unless we act fast, the economic future is bleak.
Wealth has been used to corrupt public policies which have been responsible
for a stagnant or declining standard of living.
Without pressure from many sources, this will only become much worse.


Tuesday, July 9, 2019

...To Keep From Sinking Down


The world is at the crossroads.

While the social and political systems of the past lifted millions out of poverty and shaped our national and global policies were overall satisfactory in attaining certain goals, in the post industrial century they are failing us. One problem is antiquated laws that are ill-suited to deal with contemporary problems. What is needed today is a set of interconnected activities that have the goal of shifting the structures of our social and economic systems to succeed in the area where previous industrial revolutions have failed to deliver sustainable benefits to all citizens, including for our future generations.

Realistically, we face the task of understanding and governing 21st-century technologies with a 20th-century mindset and 19th-century institutions.

Improved living standards and well-being were not evenly distributed as the past industrial revolutions progressed. Today, as a result, the world continues to struggle with a range of challenges: median wages in advanced economies are stagnating or falling despite staggering economic growth for some,  developing economies are struggling to translate economic growth into broad-based, sustainable progress in living standards; and nearly one in 10 people live in extreme poverty unnecessarily .

The question posed is: what type of thinking, and what kind of institutions do we need, to create a world where everyone has the chance to benefit from the highest possible levels of human development?

While I can't answer that that question for you,
I can say with certainty,
that the mindsets, institutions, and practices of the past
are not the answer.

We need new thinking, and fresh proposals.
And we need this now.

Wednesday, January 23, 2019

Revisiting Orwell & "Newspeak"

~George Orwell's "1984"

As cultures decay, the language decays too. 
Examine how words are used to disguise rather than illuminate an action.
So you liberate a city by destroying it.
Lies are alternative facts.

Since the obvious ease and willingness of the White House to blatantly deceive the public became self evident, George Orwell’s classic dystopian novel 1984 has been in high demand. The book had climbed all the way to No. 1 on Amazon’s best-sellers list, and remains on the best seller list.

The novel, from which phrases like “Big Brother” and “doublethink” were born, is likely the U.K.’s most famous depiction of an authoritarian surveillance state. And much of the book, particularly its fictional thought-suppressing language, Newspeak, will seem pertinent.  Some phrases in particular  - “The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command” ― have seemed especially relevant in the wake of deceptions over things as indisputable as crowd size, good being evil, up being down.

Here is a link to another piece that further explores "Newspeak" and the role Orwell's 1984 plays in today's post truth world. (There is a link to where you can read the novel free online as well).
Of course 1984, while echoing today's decay; is not a manifesto of how to deal with our plight.
On the contrary, humanity, independent thought, truth and justice lose at the end...and  the protagonists don’t survive.

There is however another Orwell penned piece which may be a better source of advice regarding our current state of malaise.  His essay, "Politics And The English Language" deals with his personal observations of language being used by politicos as a weapon of mass deception.

Orwellian Thought Crime

"You must be a bigot if you point out bigotry"
Words are sabotaged to confuse, so that at election time people will solemnly vote against their own interests. Someone who thinks this way cannot ever begin to conceptualize truth.

So the desire of anti-democracy ideologues is to remove the ability of those who would criticize their anti-democratic activities and to curtail the flow of democratic ideas.
There is abundant evidence that one of the ways they do this is by intentionally destroying language.
Language is the medium through which ideas flow.

Language is systematically mapped and words historically used to describe potentates and the traditional authorities in their service , these potentates have purposefully twisted those words into terms used against those who oppose such plutocracy. This tactic both attacks the opponents of democracy and more importantly deprives them of the words that can be used to attack aristocracy.

A simple example is the term "race-baiting".
In the Nexis database, uses of "race-baiting" undergo a sudden switch in the early 1990's.
Before then, "race-baiting" referred to racists.
Afterward, it referred in a twisted way to people who oppose racism.
What happened?
It's simple:  Stink Tank rhetoricians were tired of the political advantage that their opponents had from their use of that word, so they took it away from them.

A more complicated example is the word "racist".
Language revisionist rhetoricians have tried to take this word away as well by constantly coming up with new ways to stick the word onto liberals and their policies.
For example they referred to affirmative action as "racist".
Obviously this is false; it is an example of this attempt to destroy language.
Racism is the notion that one race is intrinsically better than another.
Affirmative action is arguably discriminatory, as a means of partially offsetting discrimination in other places and times, but it is not racist.
Pro-aristocracy spokesmen have even stuck the word "racist" on people for opposing racism.
The notion seems to be that these people addressed themselves to the topic of race, and the word "racist" is sort of an adjective relating somehow to race.
In any event this is an attack on language...the medium we use to communicate ideas.
And ideas form the basis of civilization.
Ultimately the attack on language is an attack on civilization itself.



The entire reason for Orwell’s destruction of language
was to literally narrow the person’s ability to think certain thoughts.
It’s beyond thought crime, and it’s happening right here, right now.
It does not matter what year is on your calendar, it’s 1984.

Wednesday, January 2, 2019

The Right Wing Extremists Destruction Of Democracy - A History





To most Americans living in the North, Brown vs. the board of education was a ruling to end segregated schools—nothing more, nothing less.
End of story.

To many in the South, Brown represented much more.
At a minimum, the federal courts could no longer be counted on to defer reflexively to states’ rights arguments. More concerning was the likelihood that the high court would be more willing to intervene when presented with compelling evidence that a state action was in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantee of “equal protection” under the law.
States’ rights, in effect, were yielding in preeminence to individual rights.

CARRY ME BACK

In Virginia at the time, it was easy to imagine how a court might now rule, if presented with evidence of the state of Virginia’s archaic labor relations, its measures to suppress voting, or its efforts to buttress the power of reactionary rural whites by under-representing the moderate voters of the cities and suburbs of Northern Virginia. Federal meddling could rise to levels once unimaginable.

To many whites, this decision meant that Northern liberals were going to tell the South how to run their society, and tax property owners more for improvements such as electricity.

To counter this, the University of Virginia created a school with a political agenda to maintain Southern rights, headed by James McGill Buchanan, who, along with his team, was the main founder of the Koch brothers and other billionaires with a similar philosophy game plan of how to go about getting rid of Social Security, Medicare, and other new Deal Programs. The Koch’s discovered Buchanan in the early 1970s.

Although this began many decades ago, it wasn’t until the early 21st century that most of us began to sense that something extraordinarily troubling had somehow entered American politics.
 Several GOP-controlled state legislatures inflicted flesh-wounding cuts in public education,
while rushing through laws to enable unregulated charter schools and provide tax subsidies for private education.
In Wisconsin, North Carolina, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Iowa, these same GOP-controlled legislatures also took aim at state universities and colleges, which had long been integral components of state economic development efforts—and bipartisan sources of pride. Chancellors who dared to resist their agenda were summarily removed.

Then came a surge of synchronized proposals to suppress voter turnout.
In 2011 and 2012, legislators in 41 states introduced more than 180 bills to restrict who could vote and how.
Most of these bills were aimed at low-income, minority, young people and the less mobile elderly.

THE CLOT THICKENS


When the Kochs and their minions could not prevent the passage of the Affordable Care act,
 they shut down the government for sixteen days in 2013 in an attempt to defund it.

Numerous independent observers described such stonewalling, vicious partisanship, and attempts to bring the normal functioning of government to a halt as “unprecedented.”
 When the Republicans would not agree to conduct hearings to consider the president’s nominee to fill the Supreme Court seat left vacant after Justice Antonin Scalia died in early 2016, even the usually reticent Supreme Court justice Clarence Thomas spoke out. “At some point,” he told the Heritage Foundation, (a conservative think tank), “we are going to have to recognize that we are destroying our institutions."

All of these actions and more not listed above were part of a well-planned and well-coordinated national campaign, some of it promoted by the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) which keeps its elected members a secret. It was producing hundreds of “model laws” each year for Republican legislators to enact in their states—and nearly 20% were enacted. There were laws to devastate labor unions, rewrite tax codes, undo environmental protections, privatize public resources, and require police to take action against undocumented immigrants.



In 2010, the brilliant investigative journalist Jane Mayer alerted Americans to the fact that two billionaire brothers, Charles and David Koch, had poured more than a hundred million dollars into a “war against Obama.”
She went on to research and document how the Kochs and other ultra rich right-wing donors were providing vast quantities of “dark money” (political spending that, by law, had become untraceable).
(Read "Dark Money"...a fine book)

After the Koch brothers saw what the small Virginia school was doing, they went on to spend hundreds of millions of dollars on institutions to create operatives to infiltrate government and other institutions with their anti-democratic ideas, such as the Cato Institute, the Heritage Foundation, Citizens for a Sound Economy, Americans for Prosperity, FreedomWorks, the Club for Growth, the State Policy Network, the Competitive Enterprise Institute, the Tax Foundation, the Reason Foundation, the Leadership Institute, and more, to say nothing of the Charles Koch Foundation and Koch Industries itself. Others were being hired and trained here to transform legal understanding and practice on matters from health policy to gun rights to public sector employment.

Still others were taking what they learned here to advise leading Republicans and their staffs, from Virginia governors to presidential candidates. The current vice president, Mike Pence, a case in point, has worked with many of these organizations over the years and regurgitates their agenda.

Very early on, Buchanan and the Koch brothers realized that the American people would not support their plans, so to win they had to work behind the scenes and lie about what they really wanted:
 no rules,
no regulations,
stopping taxation of wealthy individuals and their corporate entities,
and a weak government whose only function was the maintenance of social order
with themselves at the top. 

They viewed taxation to advance social justice, improve the standard of living,  or the common good as a mob attempt to take by force what the takers had no moral right to: the fruits of another person’s efforts. It began with individuals, powerless on their own, who had figured out that if they joined together, they could use their strength in numbers to move government officials to hear their concerns and act upon them.

Charles Koch did not just become a convert to the ultra-predatory capitalist radical right.
He is the sole reason why this movement alters the trajectory of the United States in ways that are profoundly disturbing.

Charles Koch made his money the good ol' fashioned way.
He inherited it.
He multiplied the earnings of the corporation he inherited by a factor of at least 1,000 entirely by corrupting politicians and even judges to do things which maximize his profits. Case in Point -
Paul Ryan. The Kochs spent 20 million dollars getting and keeping him elected.
They gave him 500 thousand dollars just days after the Tax gift bill for the wealthy passed
...even though he was no longer running for anything and stepping down in 2018.

Americans for Tax Fairness estimates that the Kochs and their conglomerate Koch Industries will get  $840 million and $1.4 billion in income tax breaks each year after congress pushed their bill through.
That's a return on investment of at least 4,100 percent on the $20 million they spent to pass the law.

They are laughing at you America.
You have been fleeced and you are chumps to the Kochs.
You are only useful as an organ farm for the Kochs to harvest.

After 2008, Koch libertarians began to call themselves conservatives, knowing full well that the last thing they wanted was to conserve, they want destruction...but saw strategic advantages in doing so. A similar cynicism ruled Koch’s decision to bankroll the religious right, and men like Jerry Falwell and Ralph Reed mobilized white evangelicals for political action on their behalf.
These religious hucksters were happy to sell Koch economics to their flocks—above all, opposition to public schooling and calls for reliance on family provision or charity in place of government assistance. The Koch team also learned how to leverage wider corporate backing.

The Koch team’s most important stealth move, and the one that proved most critical to success, was to wrest control over the machinery of the Republican Party, beginning in the late 1990s and with sharply escalating determination after 2008. From there it was just a short step to lay claim to being the true representatives of the party, declaring all others Republicans in name only. But while these radicals of the right operate within the Republican Party and use that party as a delivery vehicle, make no mistake about it: the cadre’s loyalty is not to the Grand Old Party or its traditions or standard-bearers. Their loyalty is to their revolutionary cause.

The new men in the wings respect only compliance; if they fail to get it, they respond with swift vengeance. The cadre targets for removal any old-time Republicans deemed a problem, throwing big money into their next primary race to unseat them.

U.S. senator Arlen Specter, of Pennsylvania, one of the first longtime Republicans to lose his seat for his failure to obey, referred to those who undermined him as “cannibals” who seek “the end of governing as we know it.” Others learned from experience how to survive. The Reagan Republican and six-term U.S. senator Orrin Hatch of Utah exploded after being targeted by a challenger from his own party in 2012: “These people are not conservatives. They’re not Republicans. They’re radical libertarians. . . . I despise these people.” He was right that they were not what they said they were, but the scare taught him to stop bucking and comply to keep his job. And, of course, there is John Boehner, the former House Speaker, who in 2015 finally gave up and walked out, calling one of the leaders of this cause inside the Capitol, Ted Cruz, “Lucifer in the flesh”.


Our trouble in grasping what has happened comes, in part, from our inherited way of seeing the political divide. Americans have been told for so long, from so many quarters, that political debate can be broken down into conservative versus liberal, pro-market versus pro-government, Republican versus Democrat, that it is hard to recognize that something more insidious is afoot, a shrewd long game blocked from our sight by these stale classifications. So not having words to fit what Republicans have become, we assume that what we are seeing is just very ugly partisanship, perhaps made worse by social media. But it is more than that. The Republican Party is now in the control of a hypnotized cult  for whom compromise is a dirty word.

Their cause, they say, is liberty. But by that they mean the insulation of private property rights from the reach of government—and the takeover of what was long public (schools, prisons, western lands, and much more) by corporations, a system that would radically reduce the freedom and quality of life of the many.

The Koch libertarian network had so much money and power at its disposal as the primary season began that every single Republican presidential front-runner was bowing to its agenda. Not a one would admit that climate change was a real problem or that guns weren’t as good as God.
Every one of them attacked public education and teachers’ unions and advocated more charter schools and public subsidies for religious schools. All called for radical changes in taxation and government spending. Each one claimed that Social Security and Medicare were in mortal crisis and that individual retirement and health savings accounts, presumably to be invested with Wall Street firms, were the best solution. They didn't back Trump...the authoritarian pussy grabbing was not Koch style. But they owned outright every other candidate in the GOP race.
Koch showed up at Trump tower election night though.



For Trump, the presidency is not only about power and rampant narcissism. It’s also part of his brand, sold to foreign diplomats and domestic suck-ups alike at the Trump International Hotel, to would-be investors in properties belonging to his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, to Chinese consumers of his daughter’s fashion brands,onymous Ivanka Tru the epmp lines. And don’t forget members of and visitors to his golf clubs. There’s hush money and hacked emails and oligarch pals and all manner of stuff emitting noxious odors. The preceding list barely scratches the surface. But without the Koch brothers, who virtually own the Republican legislature, Trump could not remain in power.
Despite their love of the libertarian faith, the Kochs have thrown in with a tainted authoritarian because it’s working for them.

It’s won them a tax bill that starves government and issues a windfall to the wealthy.
It’s won them the administration’s policy of removing two regulations for every new one that’s implemented. (The brothers’ conglomerate, Koch Industries, is a famous polluter.) It’s won them a promise to open up more, even sacred, public lands for mineral and fossil fuel extraction.

We’ll probably never know the scope of the sprawl of the Koch network of interlocking nonprofit organizations, thanks to the unleashing of dark money in the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United decision—you know, the “money is speech” case that allows nonprofit groups to conceal the names of their donors. That dark money is pretty much paying for the perpetuation of Donald Trump’s corruption of the presidency and the U.S. Constitution. Because if the Kochs wanted Trump gone, they could put a bug in a few congressional ears about articles of impeachment. Yet they don’t. They may even feed their youthful ward, Paul Ryan, to the Trumpian beast that Congress has become.

In the end, it seems, there is no real division between the authoritarian and the neo-libertarian Kochs. Stronger than those differences is their mutual commitment to one unifying principle: greed.
Summary

It is unlikely that the United States can find its way back from the corruption epitomized by the Trump administration without addressing the corrosive effect of the dark money unleashed by the Supreme Court.

Democrats would be wise to shine a light on the corruption represented by Trump and his congressional supporters. It’s time to revive legislation that would turn off the dark-money spigot.

The very life of the constitution as well as democracy depends on it.

Are the right-wing billionaire neo libertarians a “fifth column”?


Is what we are dealing with merely a social movement of the right whose radical ideas must eventually face public scrutiny and rise or fall on their merits? No.
 This is the story of something quite different, something never before seen in American history.
 I use these words quite hesitantly and carefully—
it is a fifth-column assault on American democratic governance.
The term “fifth column” has been applied to stealth supporters of an enemy who assist by engaging in propaganda and sabotage to prepare the way for its conquest.
 A movement that knows it can never win majority support is not a classic social movement.

Their hostile takeover maneuvers very much like a fifth column, operating in a highly calculated fashion, more akin to an occupying force than to an open group engaged in the usual give-and-take of politics. The size of this force is enormous. The social scientists who have led scholars in researching the Koch network write that it “operates on the scale of a national U.S. political party” and employs more than three times as many people as the Republican committees had on their payrolls in 2015.

This points to another characteristic associated with a fifth column: the tactic of overwhelming the normal political process with schemes to disrupt its functioning. Indeed, this massive and well-funded force is turning the party it has occupied toward ends that most Americans and even Republican voters do not want, such as the privatization of Social Security, Medicare, and education.

What this cause really seeks is a return to oligarchy, to a world in which both economic and effective political power are to be concentrated in the hands of a few. It would like to reinstate the kind of political economy that prevailed in America at the opening of the 20th century, when the mass disfranchisement of voters and the legal treatment of labor unions as illegitimate enabled large corporations and wealthy individuals to dominate Congress and most state governments alike, and to feel secure that the nation’s courts would not interfere with their reign.

The American people have used their power to do many significant things that required tax revenues: provide public education, develop manufacturing, build roads and bridges, create land-grant universities, protect the safety of food and drugs, enable workers to speak as one through unions, prevent old-age poverty, fight discrimination, assure the right to vote, and clean up our air and water, to name a few. These are achievements in which most citizens have taken pride.That may all be a bit of nostalgia now.

Make no mistake, while lots of American Robber Barons have skeletons in the family closet.
Charles and David Koch, are in a league of their own.
The father of these famous rightwing billionaires was Fred Koch, who started his fortune with $500,000 received from Stalin for his assistance constructing 15 oil refineries in the Soviet Union in the 1930s. A couple of years later, his company, Winkler-Koch, helped the Nazis complete their third-largest oil refinery. The facility produced hundreds of thousands of gallons of high-octane fuel for the Luftwaffe, until it was destroyed by Allied bombs in 1944.

In 1938, the patriarch wrote that “the only sound countries in the world are Germany, Italy and Japan”. To make sure his children got the right ideas, he hired a German nanny. The nanny was such a fervent Nazi that when France fell in 1940, she resigned and returned to Germany. After that, Fred became the main disciplinarian, whipping his children with belts and tree branches.

Twenty years after collaborating with the Nazis, Fred Koch had lost none of his love for extremism. In 1958, he was one of the 11 original members of the John Birch Society, an organization which accused scores of prominent Americans, including President Dwight Eisenhower, of communist sympathies.

In 1960, Koch revealed his racism writing: “The colored man looms large in the Communist plan to take over America.”
He strongly supported the movement to impeach chief justice Earl Warren, after the supreme court voted to desegregate public schools in Brown v Board of Education.
His sons became Birchers too
Yes, the Kochs have a vision for America.
Enslaving it and raping it. What the Kochs and other post truth American "Robber Barons" are doing here is also being done in most of our allies democracies. Oligarchs are destroying the fabric of democracy through disinformation, promoting hate, fear, and nativism. They are all using similar corrupting methods. 
It's time to wake up from this nightmare folks. If we can't stop the dark money and corrupt manipulation, we deserve to be Koch's chumps. We deserve to be robbed blind by Trump.
Say goodnight Dick.